E-Democracy Pages Wiki

Search Wiki

 

Tools

 

Next Generation Ideas

From E-Democracy.org

Revision as of 08:24, 9 December 2009 by Admin (Talk | contribs) (Draft Process (for your input now))

Back to Participation 3.0

DRAFT

  • Participation 3.0 Outreach and Convening - The result will be a multi-year, multi-funder next generation online "locally everywhere" civic engagement initiative gathering ideas and talent broadly from around the United States and beyond that builds on our 15+ years of experience.

Background

We currently have funding for a deep focus on gathering input from Minneapolis as a "national test bed" and are interested in funding that will allow us to engage St. Paul and Greater Minnesota. With our growing neighborhood Issues Forums network and the potential of electronic block clubs we can reach a greater percentage of the public with online civic engagement than just about anyone in the world.

Most good ideas need real people to test them out - we have the actual critical mass of "e-participants" and you have the ideas/tools/resources ... so let's connect these strengths and discover what really works and can be technologically designed to roll out nationally or globally for local communities everywhere or what needs to simply be done one community at a time by documenting and spreading best practices.

Prioritizing Ideas

During the first quarter of 2010 we will begin gathering the best ideas from existing experiments on a global basis. An extensive list of ~25 big local online civic engagement ideas/services/etc. will be compiled and circulated for input to determine the top ~10 ideas with various constituencies (e.g. an idea that serves the online engagement needs of local elected officials, one that resonates strongly with local active citizens or immigrant communities active on our Issues Forums, etc.) for further development. The top ideas will be detailed in one-two page documents for broad input before being shaped into full proposals for funding.

The Public Meetings project is a prototype idea that will test our open source style collaboration process about project definition, specifications, and more competitive and open interaction with multiple open source communities to determine the best route(s) to implement.

Our first national convening effort will assist the CityCamp gathering in Chicago in late January, 2010.


Draft Process (for your input now)

This process will be refined with your input: [1]

Having an open, accessible, and transparent process walks the talk of what we suggest should exist in governance and communities. It seeks to be effective first, not simply efficient. Democracy isn't efficient, it is designed to be effective.

This process is based in part on the concern that the interested public, open government advocates, and democratically spirited elected/government officials do not have a seat at the technology development table to present or articulate online "feature" priorities. Most new projects are emerging based on the flavor of the day interest among technologists. While a percentage of these often solo projects will last more than a few months, connecting public spirited technologists with those working deeply in the world of civic engagement and open government is a primary of goal of this proposed process.

1. Gather big ideas

Generate a list of 25+ local e-democracy ideas with concise descriptions (see draft features from our widely circulated detailed discussion draft Participation 3.0 discussion draft]). We are seeking technology-enhanced democratic ideas that should be universal to all local communities NOT all new or untested ideas.

2. Convene and engage three main review audiences

    • National - civic, government, technologists/social media experts
    • Minneapolis stakeholders (and other communities based on funding)
    • Issues Forum participants
    • Will be done primarily online with some in-person and webinar/teleconference convening

3. Gather Input

Possible "IdeaScale" ranking survey and input from convening/conferences/webinars with review audiences to determine which ideas resonate and inspire. What online civic engagement features are so important that they should be universal?

4. Select top ~10 ideas

The top ideas will be then outlined in detailed one to two pagers based on common format with feedback/engagement of review audiences. These ideas will then be circulated informally to potential funders as well as technologists, open source communities, and companies. In some cases third party tools will already exist and the "Participation 3.0" goal will be to bring the idea to the largest possible percentage of the public in a test community to determine its effectiveness before seeking to push it universally to all communities.

5. Key ideas developed into full multi-year, multi-funder, multi-partner grant proposal

Further develop the best ideas into full proposals with cost estimates, implementation options and key partners, and submit to potential funders as part of multi-year, multi-funder full Participation 3.0 launch. While Minneapolis and potentially other Minnesota communities are serving as our initial national local test market, we are interested in working with other pilot communities who can demonstrate an ability to raise complementary local resources.

6. Funded Ideas Go Into Open Specification Process

If funded, our open specification process will be initiated to fully spec out the effort/feature/tool/web site in a transparent and open manner. This innovative - fund real collaboration toward an outcome, not a pre-selected locked in vendor. This process will be tested in 2010 with our Public Meetings effort. We seek to test this model and expect that many ideas will actually come to independent fruition by bring local online civic engagement challenges to technologist inspired and able to implement/contribute solutions along the way.

7. Competitions/Competitive Bidding for Larger Budget Items

For major ideas requiring extensive development, we will explore options for competitive/collaborative bidding among open source development communities to implement specification as well a lead partner organizations to host the project as required.

 

Home - Mobile - Forums - Wiki - Blog - About - Help - Contact - People - Donate - Rules - Archives