Difference between revisions of "Defining next generation online civic engagement"
From E-Democracy.org
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* Democratic and community needs that are vital | * Democratic and community needs that are vital | ||
− | ** | + | ** ''... not just nice to have. Is this highly subjective? Yes. That is why we need your input and are starting from a bias affirming democracy and community building versus more narrow traditional e-government services, so-called Government 2.0, or journalism approaches.'' |
Revision as of 14:55, 12 March 2010
Back to Participation 3.0
By "next generation" we do not mean "new" ideas for the sake of new.
We are looking for:
- What really works somewhere but remains rare
- ... and it should be universal to all local communities in a democracy.
- Ideas that represent the next level of innovation and opportunity
- ... and pushes the envelop with new experiments, features, etc. that have a serious potential to qualify as "should be universal" in future years but needs to be fully tested.
Further, we are seeking:
- System changing ideas and opportunities
- ... things that can be incorporated into many communities in a distributed fashion."
- Democratic and community needs that are vital
- ... not just nice to have. Is this highly subjective? Yes. That is why we need your input and are starting from a bias affirming democracy and community building versus more narrow traditional e-government services, so-called Government 2.0, or journalism approaches.
Home - Mobile - Forums - Wiki - Blog - About - Help - Contact - People - Donate - Rules - Archives