Difference between revisions of "Defining next generation online civic engagement"

Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/customer/www/pages.e-democracy.org/public_html/includes/diff/DairikiDiff.php on line 434

Deprecated: assert(): Calling assert() with a string argument is deprecated in /home/customer/www/pages.e-democracy.org/public_html/includes/diff/DairikiDiff.php on line 437

Revision as of 14:48, 12 March 2010 (view source) Admin (Talk | contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:54, 12 March 2010 (view source) Admin (Talk | contribs) Newer edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:
	* Ideas that represent the next level of innovation and opportunity		* Ideas that represent the next level of innovation and opportunity
−	** ''... and pushes the envelop with new experiments, features, etc. that have a serious potential to qualify as "should be universal" in future years but need to be fully tested.''	+	** ''... and pushes the envelop with new experiments, features, etc. that have a serious potential to qualify as "should be universal" in future years but needs to be fully tested.''
		+
		+	Further, we are seeking:
		+
		+	* System changing ideas and opportunities
		+	** ''... things that can be incorporated into many communities in a distributed fashion."
		+
		+	* Democratic and community needs that are vital
		+	** "... not just nice to have. Is this highly subjective? Yes. That is why we need your input and are starting from a bias affirming democracy and community building versus more narrow traditional e-government services, so-called Government 2.0, or journalism approaches."

---

Revision as of 14:54, 12 March 2010

Back to Participation 3.0

By "next generation" we do not mean "new" ideas for the sake of new.

We are looking for:

• What really works somewhere but remains rare
  • ... and it should be universal to all local communities in a democracy.

• Ideas that represent the next level of innovation and opportunity
  • ... and pushes the envelop with new experiments, features, etc. that have a serious potential to qualify as "should be universal" in future years but needs to be fully tested.

Further, we are seeking:

• System changing ideas and opportunities
  • ... things that can be incorporated into many communities in a distributed fashion."

• Democratic and community needs that are vital
  • "... not just nice to have. Is this highly subjective? Yes. That is why we need your input and are starting from a bias affirming democracy and community building versus more narrow traditional e-government services, so-called Government 2.0, or journalism approaches."