Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /home/customer/www/pages.e-democracy.org/public_html/includes/WebStart.php on line 37

Deprecated: assert(): Calling assert() with a string argument is deprecated in /home/customer/www/pages.e-democracy.org/public_html/includes/diff/DairikiDiff.php on line 584
Difference between revisions of "Defining next generation online civic engagement" - E-Democracy.org

E-Democracy Pages Wiki

Search Wiki

 

Tools

 

Difference between revisions of "Defining next generation online civic engagement"

From E-Democracy.org

 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Back to [[Participation 3.0]]
+
Back to [[Participation 3.0]], [[Next Generation Ideas]]
  
 
By "next generation" we do not mean "new" ideas for the sake of new.
 
By "next generation" we do not mean "new" ideas for the sake of new.
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
* Ideas that represent the next level of innovation and opportunity  
 
* Ideas that represent the next level of innovation and opportunity  
** ''... and pushes the envelop with new experiments, features, etc. that have a serious potential to qualify as "should be universal" in future years but needs to be fully tested.''
+
** ''... and pushes the envelope with new experiments, features, etc. that have a serious potential to qualify as "should be universal" in future years but need to be fully tested in the real world.''
  
 
Further, we are seeking:
 
Further, we are seeking:
Line 18: Line 18:
 
* Democratic and community needs that are vital
 
* Democratic and community needs that are vital
 
** ''... not just nice to have. Is this highly subjective? Yes. That is why we need your input and are starting from a bias affirming democracy and community building versus more narrow traditional e-government services, so-called Government 2.0, or journalism approaches.''
 
** ''... not just nice to have. Is this highly subjective? Yes. That is why we need your input and are starting from a bias affirming democracy and community building versus more narrow traditional e-government services, so-called Government 2.0, or journalism approaches.''
 +
 +
Finally, this process is:
 +
 +
* Agnostic - We are interested in ideas/needs that might position any number of leaders in front of universal implementation.
 +
** ''... be it government, non-profits, commercial, individual or some combination."
 +
 +
* Engagement - This is a broad term going well beyond informing or serving the public. Think ...
 +
** ''... transparency - What and Where?''
 +
** ''... participation - How and Why?''
 +
** ''... collaboration and problem-solving - With whom? And Together.''
 +
** ''... community building and public life - Moving local society and making lasting change.''
 +
 +
* A Flexible Beginning - This is just the start of the Participation 3.0 process.
 +
** ''... E-Democracy.org seeks to help "move the field" and with a subset of the big ideas determine where we should take lead with partners and funders and where other organizations or the "market" might lead with their strengths.''

Latest revision as of 19:58, 9 July 2010

Back to Participation 3.0, Next Generation Ideas

By "next generation" we do not mean "new" ideas for the sake of new.

We are looking for:

  • What really works somewhere but remains rare
    • ... and it should be universal to all local communities in a democracy.
  • Ideas that represent the next level of innovation and opportunity
    • ... and pushes the envelope with new experiments, features, etc. that have a serious potential to qualify as "should be universal" in future years but need to be fully tested in the real world.

Further, we are seeking:

  • System changing ideas and opportunities
    • ... things that can be incorporated into many communities in a distributed fashion."
  • Democratic and community needs that are vital
    • ... not just nice to have. Is this highly subjective? Yes. That is why we need your input and are starting from a bias affirming democracy and community building versus more narrow traditional e-government services, so-called Government 2.0, or journalism approaches.

Finally, this process is:

  • Agnostic - We are interested in ideas/needs that might position any number of leaders in front of universal implementation.
    • ... be it government, non-profits, commercial, individual or some combination."
  • Engagement - This is a broad term going well beyond informing or serving the public. Think ...
    • ... transparency - What and Where?
    • ... participation - How and Why?
    • ... collaboration and problem-solving - With whom? And Together.
    • ... community building and public life - Moving local society and making lasting change.
  • A Flexible Beginning - This is just the start of the Participation 3.0 process.
    • ... E-Democracy.org seeks to help "move the field" and with a subset of the big ideas determine where we should take lead with partners and funders and where other organizations or the "market" might lead with their strengths.
 

Home - Mobile - Forums - Wiki - Blog - About - Help - Contact - People - Donate - Rules - Archives